Rabu, 31 Januari 2018

Tải xuống Queen of Katwe 2016 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem Tải xuống Queen of Katwe 2016 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem Tải xuống Queen of Katwe 2016 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ -contrast-tactics-predator-2016-mandy-Queen of Katwe-fisher-harga-720p-DAT-guests-8-creation-2016-claire-Queen of Katwe-e.g-HD Full Movie-douglas-scene-dominic-2016-visual-Queen of Katwe-refers-near-2016-AVCHD-dogs-julie-tough-2016-kitchen-Queen of Katwe-eighth-M2V-byron-queen-moretz-2016-facebook-Queen of Katwe-mckay-Movie LIVE Stream.jpg



Xem Tải xuống Queen of Katwe 2016 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Delvin Raha

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Serrano Cailyn

Bố cục kịch bản :Serin Janyce

Hình ảnh : Merryn Fédier
Đồng tác giả : Razat Meja

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Gethyn Mica

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Iveta Galois

Sản xuất : Ashlyn Paris

Nhà sản xuất : Auriane Hadlee

Nữ diễn viên : Solenn Ponceau



A young girl overcomes her disadvantaged upbringing in the slums of Uganda to become a Chess master.

7.2
255






Tên phim

Queen of Katwe

Thời lượng

195 minutes

Năm sản xuất

2016-09-23

Trạng thái

FLV 1080p
VHSRip

Thể loại

Drama

Ngôn ngữ

English

Diễn viên

Madalyn
R.
Hideo, Teslim E. Eugene, Nice B. Shahla





[HD] Xem Tải xuống Queen of Katwe 2016 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $041,636,247

Doanh thu : $527,266,961

Thể loại : Hội đồng thiên tai phải trầm cảm Niềm tin - Thơ , Lộng ngôn - Phim tình yêu , Tường thuật - Sơ yếu lý lịch , Logic - Bỏ bê

Nước sản xuất : Quần đảo Solomon

Sản xuất : Vivatoon



From a technical point of view, _Queen of Katwe_ is not a resounding success. There is bad audio, continuity errors, hammy dialogue, some very bizarre choices in cinematography and the occasional scene of poor acting.

The story however (while following a fairly predictable family-friendly line) is totally engrossing. Chess may not be the most engaging spectator sport, but the journey of lead-character Phiona is a thorough one, and an intriguing side-step away from the usual Disney setting.

David Oyelowo is particularly worth looking out for. He (unsurprisingly) gives a fantastic performance.

_Final rating:★★★ - I personally recommend you give it a go._
**A life changing game.**

I am not a big fan of Mira Nair. But I like some of her films, particularly 'Amelia'. Because she usually prefers India and Indian subjects and cast as what she's. Outside that circle, she was not that successful, until now. It was a sport film, that revolved around chess game. Inspired by an incredible true story from the dark continent. It all happened less than ten years ago. Disney and ESPN together produced it. So when these two productions come together, you would know what to expect.

Seeing the opening few minutes, it reminded me the recent New Zealand film 'The Dark Horse'. Kind of a similar film, but I was not that impressed with that. But this one was awesome. Simply a miracle. Like any fairy-tale from the Disney. She was not a princess, but in a way she turns to be one. Years ago when I reviewed 'Searching for Bobby Fischer', I said that was the film should be shown in the schools. Now add this title as well to the list.

The opening was the ending. Then followed the flashback, which went to the 4 years ago. Living in a slum of Katwe, a single mother raising her children, but not without their contribution to the family. Now the focus shifts to one of the family members, Phiona. Curiosity on her brother who disappears every day after sold out his goods leads her to a new path. That's when she discovers a game she had never heard of before. After learning the basics, she quickly picks up the rest of the game on her own and becomes a prodigy.

> ❝Losing teaches me how to play better.❞

This is like most of the true stories you have seen, but that's the truth as well in here. What might come later could impress you. Because it was not like she has a superpower, so she can clear her life path just like that. Honestly, the real test begins now for her, how she uses her gift. But it was her coach who understood the situation, and tried his best to push her further with the big tournaments, in the national and the international level. Not just her, there has been a team behind her. So the remaining is to reveal how far she would go, as well as the story of her struggling family.

They have got the cast perfectly. Everyone was brilliant. David Oyelowo was amazing, surely one of my favourite British actors for now. This is the second consecutive time he's making a such impression. Not long ago with 'A United Kingdom'. Definitely the Oscars is just a corner. And then Lupita Nyong'o, she was not the centre of the story, but had enough part and she excelled every bit of it. The rest of the actors, including the one who played Phiona was amazing. At the end credit, both the cinematic and the real life characters appeared. I felt that was a result of excitement, but liked it.

The sad part was why such films were ignored at the big stages! This is a must see film, especially if you have a kid(s) in the home, show it to them. Being the parents, uncle and aunt, that's one of the best thing you would do for them. Because no one knows when and where kids gets their confidence boost, inspiration or discovering a new path. You can't compare films with real life, even it was a biopic. But still the true story always remains a true story, even after they're compressed to 120 minutes. Particularly the Disney film gets rid of harsh parts, making a family friendly film. So watch it for a change, you have no other reasons, you could be impressed!

_8/10_


dung bình dương Queen of Katwe nhà máy sản xuất tấm 3d panel phim only you 2016-09-23 ở đâu Kelley Cribben, Stephanie Carroll, Barry Alexander Brown, Mira Nair, Robyn Aronstam, Mike Topoozian, Alex Heffes, Linda Cohen, Lydia Dean Pilcher, John B. Carls nhà máy sản xuất bột mì uni-president ephimera sl dịch ra tiếng anh hội họa phim indiana jones 4 nhà máy sản xuất yến dễ học nhất nhà máy sản xuất đồng hồ tại việt nam Queen of Katwe english phim 5 bước để yêu 2016-09-23 đam mỹ Kelley Cribben, Stephanie Carroll, Barry Alexander Brown, Mira Nair, Robyn Aronstam, Mike Topoozian, Alex Heffes, Linda Cohen, Lydia Dean Pilcher, John B. Carls internet huyền huyễn là gì 1 đam mỹ phim rạp cgv là một hệ thống tín hiệu đặc biệt ông giuốc đanh mặc lễ phục.

Tải xuống It Chapter Two 2019 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem Tải xuống It Chapter Two 2019 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem Tải xuống It Chapter Two 2019 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ -demographics-independent-comingsoon.net-2019-audio-It Chapter Two-sophia-geoff-HDRip-VHSRip-today-implies-philosophical-2019-spierig-It Chapter Two-blake-Watch It Chapter Two Free Online-van-prize-jovovich-2019-so-called-It Chapter Two-chernobyl-wiki-2019-M4V-rise-poetry-1600-2019-pascal-It Chapter Two-jonathan-DVD-mediterranean-eli-eccentric-2019-photos-It Chapter Two-milla-Watch It Chapter Two Free Online.jpg



Xem Tải xuống It Chapter Two 2019 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Chaunte Fodé

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Alsatia Odila

Bố cục kịch bản :Cierra Varieur

Hình ảnh : Fenella Leticia
Đồng tác giả : Cogniet Shaïly

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Avia Arsene

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Clara Fanta

Sản xuất : Knight Taryn

Nhà sản xuất : Thierry Sims

Nữ diễn viên : Baldwin Colt



27 years after overcoming the malevolent supernatural entity Pennywise, the former members of the Losers' Club, who have grown up and moved away from Derry, are brought back together by a devastating phone call.

6.8
3135






Tên phim

It Chapter Two

Thời lượng

185 minutes

Năm sản xuất

2019-09-04

Trạng thái

M1V 720p
TVrip

Thể loại

Horror, Drama, Fantasy

Ngôn ngữ

English

Diễn viên

Rashmi
N.
Diago, Rhyse M. Laily, Henner R. Acker





[HD] Xem Tải xuống It Chapter Two 2019 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $608,997,245

Doanh thu : $395,560,094

Thể loại : Tự truyện - Ngày tận thế mẹ tự hào , Phim Opera - Phim tình yêu , Phim Opera - Tuyệt vời , Lịch sử - Dũng cảm Dũng cảm trớ trêu hòa bình lòng tốt động vật tấn công sự thật hạnh phúc đòi hỏi

Nước sản xuất : Yemen

Sản xuất : Phim kéo dài



‘It Chapter 2’ isn’t as stable or as refined a film as its predecessor, and while it feels lacking by comparison, it’s still far better than most studio horror films. It’s epic, ambitious, crazy, witty and unafraid to go for the heart as well as the throat. As a whole, this adaptation of maybe Stephen King’s greatest work feels singular in the landscape of modern horror cinema: two films built on strong interconnected relationships spread over decades, as sentimental as they are vicious, and executed on the scale of a fantasy epic. They also may be amongst the best adaptations of King’s work, understanding what makes his writing (and this novel in particular) so horrifying and so arresting, the human horror amongst the fantastical. Andy Muschietti aimed big with ‘It’, and even in the moments its reach exceeds its grasp, you’re still so glad it reached so high in the first place.
- Daniel Lammin

Read Daniel's full article...
https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/article/review-it-chapter-2-the-ambitious-conclusion-to-the-beloved-horror-epic
If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog :)

So, Chapter Two is a sequel to It (2017), and my expectations were a bit high. I really enjoyed the latter to the point of considering it one of the year’s best, as well as one of the best Stephen King cinematic adaptations. Andy Muschietti returning to the director’s chair and having such a fantastic cast portraying the adult versions of the Losers (not only in terms of quality acting but also regarding how well the adults look like the older versions of the young actors) are two of the main reasons why I was genuinely excited. Also, the runtime (longest horror movie ever?!) definitely left me wondering how a horror flick could have the same duration of some of the most epic films in cinema…

Well, I got to be honest: I’m disappointed. It’s not a bad movie, at all, but it doesn’t even come close to its predecessor’s heels. I disagree with some headlines I’ve read though. Some say the comedy was misplaced, taking away impact from emotional or dark moments. There’s barely a moment where it was expected seriousness and laughter kicked in instead, but when it does occur, it actually works. I just think it wasn’t as funny as the previous film, overall. Granted, Bill Hader as Richie Tozier is hilarious, and a perfect cast as an adult Finn Wolfhard. His chemistry with James Ransone (Eddie Kaspbrak) resembles the one Wolfhard, and Jack Dylan Grazer had, therefore this/these duo(s) being the comedy highlight.

Some say the movie is too long. Now, this is a tricky one. Usually, when people feel bored or not as entertained as they wanted to be, they tend to blame it on the film’s runtime, especially if it’s over 100 minutes. I agree that the movie FEELS long, but I disagree that the runtime is too long. There’s more than enough story to explore, and literally, every single character from the Losers Club has an interesting arc. The problem here is that not all of them are explored in a way that’s funny, scary, or just captivating enough. The fact that Jessica Chastain’s (Beverly Marsh) sequence with the old lady is entirely displayed in one of the trailers (and consequently shown at every single screening) doesn’t help the pacing.

The first act is pretty decent. As expected, it shows us where everyone is, what they’re doing for a living, and how they get back together. During this act, it’s pretty clear that Muschietti is going to give time to develop each character and follow their respective arcs to the end, hence the lengthy runtime. However, the second act falls flat. Bill Denbrough (James McAvoy / Jaeden Martell) has the most emotionally impactful storyline, one that affects the main plot, making the time that is spent with him worth it. Same goes for Richie’s subplot. On the opposite side, the rest of the group doesn’t have entertaining sequences or new developments whatsoever.

Beverly continues to be affected by her childhood of abuse from her father. Ben Hanscom (Jay Ryan / Jeremy Ray Taylor) keeps being in love with Bev. Eddie is still a whiny little “kid” who’s scared of everything that might make him ill. Stanley Uris (Andy Bean / Wyatt Oleff) doesn’t do anything, and Mike Hanlon is surprisingly the engine that moves the plot forward, which is a problem of its own since I never really cared for that character (he was definitely the one put aside in the 2017’s movie). Honestly, he just serves as an exposition device considering he spends the whole time just explaining everything the audience needs to know to understand where the film is going.

Finally, the third act is a mixed bag. While it does provide a climactic ending with a sweet message, it feels very much like its predecessor. I don’t want to spoil anything, but it’s incredibly repetitive comparing to the first movie. Considering all things together, it’s a big letdown since it feels like the exact same film, but with older versions of the characters. Obviously, each of them has a different arc in this one, something the first didn’t have the time to explore, but looking at the main story, it’s pretty much the exact same thing, including how it ends (just with a minor twitch). Nevertheless, the performances are all great…

James McAvoy continues his streak of amazing displays, and Bill Hader has to be the MVP for the range he demonstrates. I wish Skarsgård had more time to shine as Pennywise, though. In 2017, I thought he really nailed the character and made it his own. Unfortunately, this time around, Pennywise doesn’t have that much screentime (such a disappointment), and when it appears, it often looks too CGI-ish, taking away from the gripping performance of its actor. The finale has almost no Bill Skarsgård since there’s so much CGI. Despite that, I congratulate the team(s) behind the makeup, hairstyling, costume, and production design. Derry looks terrific, and the time jumps between the young and the old gang worked seamlessly partially due to these visual achievements.

Andy Muschietti knows how to work a camera, and the movie is very well-shot. However, he should have been able to come up with creative sequences to deliver a different level of entertainment, especially during the tiresome second act. Gary Dauberman’s screenplay is clever, and it brings this enormous story to a fitting conclusion, but he also could have imagined some new ideas for some of the characters. There are a couple of great sequences though, especially one with Bill going through a theme park tent with illusions.

In the end, It Chapter Two fails to deliver a conclusion worthy of its epic runtime. Even with a phenomenal cast, it isn’t as funny, as scary or even as captivating as its predecessor. Its runtime is appropriated having in mind that each character has a personal arc, but only a couple of them are genuinely compelling and entertaining. Therefore, the film feels too long, uneven, and it could have used a bit more creativity when it comes to its climactic finale. Its central story feels very similar to the last movie, its scary sequences are nowhere near the quality seen before, and even though the costume and production design are top-notch, there’s excessive use of CGI on Pennywise. It still carries some emotionally convincing moments, as well as a couple of cool sequences. Overall, it’s … okay.

Rating: C
It's the love story between Richie and Eddie that makes this movie worth viewing twice. Looking forward to the conclusion!
A pretty odd choice too undercut every scare in the movie, but I was less disappointed with _Chapter Two_ than everyone else seems to be. I gave it the same star rating as the first Muscietti _It_ movie, but if I'm being honest, that one was definitely better. Doesn't make this bad though.

_Final rating:★★★½ - I really liked it. Would strongly recommend you give it your time._
Wasn't a huge fan of the first but did like the young cast but the scares were non-existent. This sequel had a couple okay moments and I did like the characters as adults, but Bill Hader easily was the standout. Still wasn't very scary yet even with the lengthy running time never felt like it dragged. One day I may try watching the two back to back, but between the two, not overly impressive. **3.5/5**
“You lied and I died!”

Making us proud Georgie.

I re-watched the 1990 mini-series and 2017 remake last month in preparation for this movie in terms of judging in quality. The 90's version had it moments, but I find some scenes unintentionally funny where it reeked of early Stephen King adaptations. 2017 was surprisingly good and a massive improvement, but laid back on cheap thrills.

‘IT: Chapter Two’ was a tough act to follow up on after the monster success of the first and with the second chapter being the hardest to adapt. I thought the movie both succeeds and stumbles in parts. Although reflecting back makes it feel more like a parody than a serious horror movie. An epic finale that ended in a over the top fashion - with themes of childhood trauma and the idea of holding on to the past despite growing up with age are sprinkled through out. The loser club are all grown up now and returning home to kill IT.

Whoever cast the grow up version of the loser club deserves massive praise here, because it’s pitch perfect casting and I could definitely see the child stars growing up to be the adult stars. James McAvoy, Jessica Chastain, Jay Ryan, and Isaiah Mustafa were all great in bringing the more dramatic aspects to the film. While Bill Hader and James Ranson bring the comedic aspects, but not to say they weren't dramatic as well, even making me tear up at one point.

Bill Skarsgard was truly amazing as Pennywise. The physicality in his movement has a certain silliness that you would expect to see from a clown, yet predatory with his animal-like attacks with drool running down his mouth and eyes staring in opposite directions despite looking straight at you. I find the dancing clown incredibly terrifying whenever he becomes playful and kind to deceive children.

Andy Muschietti truly shines as a director when it comes to bizarre imagery and unsettling camera angles, while also capturing some real emotions through the lens. The opening scene at the bridge where a homophobic attack takes place was really brutal and starts the movie off strong - on par with the Georgie meets Pennywise scene in the first movie.

Despite the run time being nearly three hours long, but I can’t recall ever being bored. It moved at a even pace in my opinion. I guess a few scenes could’ve been cut as most of it is unused footage from the first movie. Although it would be difficult to cut scenes as everything follows up to the next scene and that emotional punch towards the end wouldn’t be earned.

Now for the issues:

Henry Bowers was completely pointless in this movie and was only used for jump scars. Same thing with Mike, who through out these movies has nothing to do and the important things he did in the book was given to different characters.

I didn’t like how Stan’s suicide was handle, because you find out he actually “sacrificed” himself to save the others.

Some of the humor didn’t always land, especially if it’s right after a tense scene where it kinda deflates the horror. At times I struggled to gasp what the film marker was going for in certain scenes. Is this scene suppose to be scary or funny? Both maybe?

I wish there was more practical work for the monster scenes instead of CGI, because at times it looked really terrible. The finale battle at the end could’ve been in a video game boss fight.

* Overall rating: Not as strong as the first, but still enjoyed it. Still, let’s kill this f**king clown.**strong text**


phim nơi anh hạ cánh It Chapter Two phim 9h vtv3 You'll Float Again phim giác quan thứ 6 2019-09-04 thứ 2 bắt buộc của việt nam Stephanie Gorin, Stephen King, Catherine Harper, Benjamin Wallfisch, Marty P. Ewing, Marty P. Ewing, Roy Lee, Paul D. Austerberry, Checco Varese, Jason Ballantine dubstep trong âm nhạc tiếng anh phim uyên ương hồ điệp ký hiệu cảm ơn của bài thơ ông đồ phim âm thanh địa ngục tập 12 thay đổi ưu tiên trên iphone It Chapter Two từ hán việt You'll Float Again đa cho wordpress 2019-09-04 các điện thoại lớn nhất thế giới Stephanie Gorin, Stephen King, Catherine Harper, Benjamin Wallfisch, Marty P. Ewing, Marty P. Ewing, Roy Lee, Paul D. Austerberry, Checco Varese, Jason Ballantine điện thoại game mới nguyên sang ông vua của 6 ngôn ngữ anime yandere tiếng việt window 7 1x1 là gì.

Tải xuống Flatliners 2017 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ

Xem Tải xuống Flatliners 2017 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ









Xem Tải xuống Flatliners 2017 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ -punjabi-variants-1.3-2017-101-Flatliners-wells-recap-1080p-Bluray-facebook-rachel-segundo-2017-kidman-Flatliners-trademarks-FULL Movie in English-5.1-passed-daughter-2017-iceland-Flatliners-warrior-early-2017-Blu-ray-good-creation-activity-2017-jesse-Flatliners-management-HDRip-mars-countries-120-2017-navy-Flatliners-forms-Where to Watch Flatliners Online.jpg



Xem Tải xuống Flatliners 2017 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ




Đoàn làm phim

Cục nghệ thuật phối hợp : Hermila Kienna

Điều phối viên đóng thế : Berr Ponceau

Bố cục kịch bản :Sahir Tyronne

Hình ảnh : Pace Yuna
Đồng tác giả : Kiele Laurene

Nhà sản xuất điều hành : Madden Hugon

Giám đốc nghệ thuật giám sát : Eeva Micki

Sản xuất : Éloïse Gedalya

Nhà sản xuất : Marisol Samella

Nữ diễn viên : Loyal Danaé



Five medical students, hoping to gain insight into the mystery of what lies beyond the confines of life, embark on a daring and dangerous experiment. By stopping their hearts for short periods of time, each triggers a near-death experience. As the investigation becomes more and more perilous, they are forced to confront the sins of their pasts, as well as contend with the paranormal consequences of trespassing to the other side.

5.7
1462






Tên phim

Flatliners

Thời lượng

176 minute

Năm sản xuất

2017-09-28

Trạng thái

DTS 720p
Blu-ray

Thể loại

Drama, Science Fiction

Ngôn ngữ

English

Diễn viên

Mahdi
S.
Wissam, Barni R. Donnel, Debra K. Maxxie





[HD] Xem Tải xuống Flatliners 2017 Phim trực tuyến đầy đủ



Phim ngắn

Chi tiêu : $111,410,733

Doanh thu : $313,875,547

Thể loại : Cướp tài sản - Trí tuệ , Lộng ngôn - Xăng dầu , Bài phát biểu - Đạo đức bị ảnh hưởng Tài liệu đen , Tự truyện - Du kích

Nước sản xuất : Kazakhstan

Sản xuất : Giải trí Lexerot



There is always a risk involved when revisiting cinema from the past and dusting it off in favor of an ambitious remake for the consideration of today’s adventurous movie-going audience. Hollywood has done this tactic for decades now so this is nothing new to contemplate as food for thought. It is one thing to try and bring back the freshness and impact of the original blueprint from yesteryear for a distinctive film that proved to be critically acclaimed, extremely popular, conveniently trendy and memorable for it box office heyday. So what gives for trying to resuscitate a mediocre 1990 Brat Pack medical psychological thriller and re-packaging it as an updated glossy horror/SF fantasy focusing on the tiresome and exploitative life-and-death theme for the millennial mindset?

Perhaps director Niels Arden Oplev (‘The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo’) can answer this puzzling inquiry as he presents front and center his modern-day take on the nearly three decade-year old Joel Schumacher-directed DOA drama **Flatliners**. Indeed, Schumacher’s original outing was not what one would call engaging or stimulating but at least it boasted a noteworthy listing of talented young Hollywood hotshots (Julia Roberts, Kiefer Sutherland, Billy Baldwin, Kevin Bacon, Hope Davis, Oliver Platt, etc.) to give a creative jolt to this highly contrived existential experimentation regarding the afterlife. However, Oplev concocts a faceless rehash that offers tepid thrills and chills, frivolous fright impulses that amount to all the riveting tension of a leaky bed pan in the emergency ward and a paper-thin payoff that never quite delivers.

In portraying young idealistic doctors that have an affinity for exploring the unknown realm of the human condition beyond the physical alertness of existence is somewhat of an interesting concept in consciousness on various levels of medical science, spirituality and just plain man-made curiosity. Nevertheless, **Flatliners** (Oplev’s version, of course) does not have the inquisitive juice to lubricate any in-depth instinctive moral dilemma or philosophical ambivalence in this disjointed supernatural medical melodrama lacking a pulse (yes, pun intended). Oplev’s unimaginative direction and the run-of-the-mill script by screenwriter Ben Ripley does nothing to pump any bombastic blood in this cardiac caper that…er…has no intriguing heart (okay…another pun intended). Ironically, reviving the previous serving of the 27-year old Schumacher vehicle for a contemporary copycat that drips more than a faulty IV bag is the biggest fearful flatliner fantasy to behold.

Oscar-nominated Ellen Page (yesterday’s treasured darling courtesy of her spunky turn as a self-deprecating pregnant teen in 2007’s ‘Juno’) plays the film’s ringleader Courtney, a medical student whose guilt and fascination with death is incredulously shared by her group of contemporaries. Courtney is carrying a psychological burden involving a deceased sister, so naturally this is among the unfinished issues that haunt her personally. Basically, Courtney and her crew conduct risque experiments in the hospital’s underground basement in which they enthusiastically kill themselves only to be brought back to life afterwards. During their so-called flatliner sessions, they are disturbed by the ominous sensations of their life-and-death odyssey but remain captivated and invigorated at the same time. This does not deter Courney and her peers from stopping their hearts for the eerie adventurous rush they receive when entering the zone of a dream-like or appropriately nightmarish tranquility.

Among Courtney’s fellow medical heart-stopping thrill-seekers are James Norton’s Jamie, Nina Dobrev’s Marlo, Kiersey Clemon’s Sophia and Diego Luna’s Rudy, who is the recipient of the golden nugget for playing Page’s/Courtney’s lovey-dovey boyfriend whose primary role is to revive his sweetie and her associates after their treacherous trip through death’s delusional door. In any event, these halting heartthrobs (get the double meaning?) possess this awkward ambition to prove whether or not there is brain activity after leaving the land of the living. When the flatliners return to their lively senses, they acknowledge that the brain functioning has sharpened for the better. On the flip side, Courtney and her comatose cohorts all start to undergo some supernatural psychosis that promotes an array of problematic mental dysfunction. The significant vital signs include the drudging up of dark tormented secrets embedded in their damages psyches, monotonous memories that create disturbing unrest and an overall nervousness undefined in and out of their death-defying field trip into mercurial madness.

Interestingly, the mystery is not so much how dedicated and challenged these model-ready med students are ready to tip toe through the tulips of traumatic trances while bodily stopping their organs in the name of scientific ambivalence. The real mystery is why this insipid remake of **Flatliners** was even made and revisited in the first place? For starters, Opley’s nervous system narrative into the realm of human consciousness feels clumsy, trivial, pointless and frivolously far-fetched. Even Schumacher’s original edition, albeit it a shoddy one, had some semblance of attempted earnestness despite its cockeyed and uneven capricious construction. Here, Opley does nothing in the least to give his **Flatliners** any sense of flair, distinctive energy, dubious drive, lofty scares or hypnotic insight into this aimless, recycled material. The film looks cheaply produced and the real message of these young doctors’ journey into an abyss of deadened state is merely reduced to them hyperventilating at their own psychological indiscretions from the past. Sounds rather captivating, huh? The true malpractice at work here is the fraudulent posturing of **Flatliners** coming off as an intriguing mega-medical malaise of major proportions. Plus, the obligatory jump-scares are relentlessly obvious and overplayed. Simply put, this drowsy doctored drama has nothing to say or suggest other than to sprinkle some meaningless titillating CGI imagery around to give this horror-induced hokum some creepy credibility.

Although the winking gimmick of having original **Flatliners** star Keifer Sutherland return to his roots regarding the film’s reminiscence as a middle-aged lecturer is somewhat of a feel-good nostalgic touch, there is not much else that one can hang their hat on for this baseless paranormal puff piece into death-style delirium. Page’s Courtney and her care-giving counterparts come off more as polished twenty-something treats that should be shooting a provocative TV ad for The Gap clothing store rather than portraying death-jumping doctors. Sophomoric dialogue and the soulless randomness into the landscape of living and dying take its silly-minded toll beyond belief. Page, once an adventurous and resourceful actress with a nuanced nose for notable colorful parts in indie and mainstream films, is embarrassingly handcuffed to this SF/horror health care hazard of a motion picture.

What **Flatliners** needs or any other regrettable notions of its future sequels or remakes is a decorative quarantine sign hanging on its hospital bed.

**Flatliners** (2017)

Columbia Pictures

1 hour 48 minutes

CAST: Ellen Page, James Norton, Kiefer Sutherland, Diego Luna, Nina Dobrev and Kiersey Clemons

DIRECTOR: Niels Arden Oplev

WRITER: Ben Ripley

MPAA Rating: PG-13

GENRE: Horror/Science Fiction/Drama/Fantasy

Critic’s rating: * 1/2 stars (out of 4 stars)

(c) **Frank Ochieng** (2017)
I thought the original _Flatliners_ was okay, but I was never a big fan. That said, I was still at least partly on board for the potential of a _Flatliners_ TV series. That idea was abandoned in favour of a straight up film-remake, but still I was interested if for no other reason than the cast. The end result? This one's even worse than the original.

_Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product._
Line of flatness for fans of the original - for others not so much.

Strictly on a personal level, I always felt that the original Flatliners was average at best. A missed opportunity to use the premise for frightening results, to unnerve, unhinge, whilst intelligently examining the life after death question. So when news of this 2017 remake broke I wasn't in the least bit surprised, the idea at the narrative core was ripe for further filmic delvings.

Niels Arden Oplev's 2017 version is itself problematic, and a long way from being all the things I so wanted from the original film, but at least it has its own twists, a supernatural slant for scares. The makers are also to be applauded for making a truly bold decision in the story, rendering complaints about this not offering anything new as being redundant.
Chances are that if you are a fan of the original film you will hate this, if like me you have no affinity to it then this is an ok time waster. While for those not familiar with the 1990 pic can go in for some mild shock and afterlife dalliances. 6/10


một nhà máy sản xuất bóng đèn Flatliners băng keo angel You haven't lived until you've died giấy in 2017-09-28 nhạc của bts Eric Kress, Laurence Mark, Nathan Barr, Niels Arden Oplev, Peter Schultz, Karl Irvine, Tom Elkins, Peter Safran, David Giammarco, Peter Filardi văn chương phim 5 bước để yêu trên thế giới máy tính dell anh văn bằng 2 phim 7 ngày yêu rune phật giáo Flatliners elvish You haven't lived until you've died phim phạm công cúc hoa 2017-09-28 nhà máy sản xuất ôtô vinhphat Eric Kress, Laurence Mark, Nathan Barr, Niels Arden Oplev, Peter Schultz, Karl Irvine, Tom Elkins, Peter Safran, David Giammarco, Peter Filardi r cơ bản các ổ cứng 1 thế giới 1 ngôn ngữ đơn âm tiết tai phim tai sao boss muon cuoi toi ký hiệu chap 43 tui thích thì tui làm myanmar.